Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Re: Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Postby hammAR on Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:15 pm

Hey, I don't drink either.................... :(



I consume... :lol:
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Postby Aceq2jot on Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:52 pm

hammAR wrote:Hey, I don't drink either.................... :(



I consume... :lol:


Its not payed of yet, so i want the guy with a B.A.C of 00.00 to drive :D :D
Really i am your worst Nightmare, for i walk the night and the cover of darkness belongs to me :D

You cant make a pile of Dog shat smell like a rose a bunch of Roses, so why try ???
User avatar
Aceq2jot
 
Posts: 1266 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:48 pm

Re: Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Postby nyffman on Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:55 pm

Aceq2jot wrote:The last tiem i checked it was no the public info on what happens on private property, so unless the police have been called there is no public record available or a record they have to publish for joe blow and the public. So i would becareful about making statements about manipulating data.

Nowhere did I state that they did anything dishonest or deceptive. I did not say that they manipulated data. I'm saying that a person here claims to have witnessed a violent encounter that was not reported. I understand that eye witnesses can be mistaken. But I am still free to beleive that a corporation or person with a vested interest could give false information in order to slant opinions in their favor. But, your statement does give a reason for the Shakopee police and/or the county sheriff to give the negative report on any other violent encounters. If only you
would becareful about making statements
about what others post. :roll:
our quarrel is not about the value of freedom per se, but stems from our opinion of our fellow men … a man’s admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him --Alexis de Tocqueville--
User avatar
nyffman
 
Posts: 5176 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:46 am

Re: Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Postby Aceq2jot on Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:14 am

nyffman wrote:I'm saying that a person here claims to have witnessed a violent encounter that was not reported.


And as i said unles the police were involved there is no public report available.Now if the police responded and the victim of the crime wanted to make a complaint then the officer would write a report. But if the Police never responded to the incident and it was handled by park security there would be an internal incident report which is not public data.

So just because the locals were not called it does not mean there was not a report made, just that the report is not public as it is a private entity.
Really i am your worst Nightmare, for i walk the night and the cover of darkness belongs to me :D

You cant make a pile of Dog shat smell like a rose a bunch of Roses, so why try ???
User avatar
Aceq2jot
 
Posts: 1266 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:48 pm

Re: Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Postby someone1980 on Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:19 pm

ttousi wrote:retreat is always preferable.......... that said 6 or 7 on one is a disparity of force that would warrant responding with deadly force.........death or Great Bodily harm. Sounds like GBH happened and death was not far behind.


I know you have played some of the games (IDPA, etc) or have enough experience with shooting to know what I am getting at. Having said that, could you engage 7 or even 3 people at contact range or closing rapidly? With out letting a couple rounds slide wide? I know I couldn't.

Mostly for others to think about.
Defend yourself.
Defend your family.
Defend your beliefs.
someone1980
 
Posts: 548 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:10 pm

Re: Father badly beaten for trying to protect his daugher

Postby Pat on Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:23 pm

someone1980 wrote:
ttousi wrote:retreat is always preferable.......... that said 6 or 7 on one is a disparity of force that would warrant responding with deadly force.........death or Great Bodily harm. Sounds like GBH happened and death was not far behind.


I know you have played some of the games (IDPA, etc) or have enough experience with shooting to know what I am getting at. Having said that, could you engage 7 or even 3 people at contact range or closing rapidly? With out letting a couple rounds slide wide? I know I couldn't.

Mostly for others to think about.


Start firing from position three. Move and take your shots as they present themselves. Be fast. Be furious.
"Happiness is...finding two olives in your martini when you're hungry." -Johnny Carson
Cardinal Kung Foundation , The Rule of Saint Benedict
User avatar
Pat
 
Posts: 3567 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Western Burbs

Previous

Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron