SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby The Lance on Mon Feb 04, 2013 2:51 pm

Holland&Holland wrote:If one is not a supermodel, is there any possible way one could get perhaps a trial membership? Even if it is just hypothetical, I would like to apply for a hypothetical membership please.


It's a hypothetical 10 million dollar a year membership, sorry man but I gotta be able to pay the bills and afford to host the hypothetical super models.

If money is tight the highly exclusive hypothetical range has a four thousand dollar 15 minute session you can hypothetically opt for.

I'll have my hypothetical business contacts get in touch with you to make the arrangements
I'm not down with the republican party, or the democratic party. I represent the MI6
User avatar
The Lance
 
Posts: 578 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 4:53 pm

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby XDM45 on Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:36 pm

t140 wrote:
Heffay wrote:
XDM45 wrote:As for name calling, we'll, I was called things on here before I called anyone a name


Your defense is "he started it"?



:lol:

Prior to this thread, I thought xdm was probably a smart guy. Just inexperienced.

But now I see we've recessed back to the 3rd grade.


@All

So I should just let some call me names on here and not defend myself? Just ignore it? Is that what you're saying? I can let stuff go, but only for so long, and I largely have until recently. I just reached the "full level" on my bs tolerance on here. I wish I was perfect and could just turn the other cheek every time, but I'm not and I don''t. Oh well. Jebus will send me to Hell, or Oz, or some other such made up place. At least I'll have company with many of you there with me. For those of you who are perfect, please tell me how you did it.

Anyone can think whatever they want of me, I don't care. Never have and never will. So please, by all means, feel free to do so. Have your opinion and think I'm an inexperienced a-hat who doesn't know anything and acts like a know-it-all, or think I rape baby seals while listening to Motorhead for all I care. Whatever floats your happy boat. Meh. I've said this so many times and people refuse to get it. I figure rather than get into a giant p-ing contest, I'll just start toss idiots on the ignore list. Please feel free to do the same. That way, you won't have to read my writings unless you want to. /ignore is your friend.

Ok, now off to those baby seals.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby JJ on Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:43 pm

Every thread XDM45 posts on:

"a man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." Frederick Douglass
User avatar
JJ
 
Posts: 3541 [View]
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Princeton

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby Holland&Holland on Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:53 pm

The Lance wrote:
Holland&Holland wrote:If one is not a supermodel, is there any possible way one could get perhaps a trial membership? Even if it is just hypothetical, I would like to apply for a hypothetical membership please.


It's a hypothetical 10 million dollar a year membership, sorry man but I gotta be able to pay the bills and afford to host the hypothetical super models.

If money is tight the highly exclusive hypothetical range has a four thousand dollar 15 minute session you can hypothetically opt for.

I'll have my hypothetical business contacts get in touch with you to make the arrangements


Sweet! I hypothetically sent a hypothetical check in the hypothetical mail for the a full membership. Hypothetically, I will see you on the range!
Last edited by Holland&Holland on Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12657 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby XDM45 on Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:57 pm

If you guys miss targets like you miss points in my posts, you need more practice in both areas.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby grousemaster on Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:35 pm

XDM45 wrote:If you guys miss targets like you miss points in my posts, you need more practice in both areas.



This thread is awesome. I think XDM is probably is a pretty decent guy....but needs to think before he posts. I've made many posts that I later shook my head at...it happens.
01 FFL
NRA Life Member
NRA Business Alliance
User avatar
grousemaster
 
Posts: 3493 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Waconia

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby Heffay on Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:42 pm

There is a way to respond to name calling that doesn't involve also name calling.

Shocking, I know. But it is possible. I'll search for references for you.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby grousemaster on Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:31 pm

Heffay wrote:There is a way to respond to name calling that doesn't involve also name calling.

Shocking, I know. But it is possible. I'll search for references for you.


Sarcastic and mean.
01 FFL
NRA Life Member
NRA Business Alliance
User avatar
grousemaster
 
Posts: 3493 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Waconia

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby Heffay on Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:19 pm

grousemaster wrote:
Heffay wrote:There is a way to respond to name calling that doesn't involve also name calling.

Shocking, I know. But it is possible. I'll search for references for you.


Sarcastic and mean.

I was referring to XDM and his explanation about if he is supposed to just take it. On my phone, so it's tough to quote. Sorry for the confusion. I'll update with the appropriate section quoted later so it makes more sense.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby peckerhead on Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:13 pm

The Lance wrote:The problem is a certain someone thinks they know what they're talking about..

But in reality why would any of us listen to some moron who is **** up in the head enough to open carry full time..


I'm not participating in the name-calling, but anyone who OC's full-time is just begging to be taken down a few notches by some amped-up little rookie cop. Screw that...I'm just not that adventurous.
peckerhead
 
Posts: 197 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:48 pm

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby XDM45 on Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:31 pm

peckerhead wrote:
The Lance wrote:The problem is a certain someone thinks they know what they're talking about..

But in reality why would any of us listen to some moron who is **** up in the head enough to open carry full time..


I'm not participating in the name-calling, but anyone who OC's full-time is just begging to be taken down a few notches by some amped-up little rookie cop. Screw that...I'm just not that adventurous.


Yeah, I can understand that. There very well may be an extra eager rookie cop who gets all excited over a gun, true that. Seeing a gun may give them an excuse, but then so can anything I suppose. No point in adding to it, true. I've gone all over the metro OCing and the only two things I really noticed is:

1) The Cub Foods manager asked me to put it in the car, but since I know my weapon is safer on me then left unattended (even locked up), I chose to leave instead. The sheer lack of logic and belief in media FUD* astounded me. Seeing a holstered gun isn't ok, but if no one ever saw it because it was concealed, that's ok. Like not seeing a gun somehow makes it less dangerous in their mind? I guess it's a kind of a head-in-the-sand type of thing, like if they can't see it, then it doesn't exist. Weird. Anyway, there was already a thread on it, so I'm not going to rehash it here. I'm sure many concealed guns (both legal and illegal) have been carried in Cub Foods, but only an idiot would OC a gun they don't have a permit for and can't legally carry.

( * FUD = Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, not Fudd as in Elmer )

2) I walked into a US Bank OCing and even though I was last in line, someone came up to me and asked if they could help me. they never mentioned the gun, and neither did I. I conducted my business and left. (I was getting a cashier's check, and no, I don't want to carry a large sum unarmed Thanks.)

It's not the guns you CAN see that are the problem (unless one is pointed at you), it's the ones you CAN'T see that concern me the most to me.

OCing isn't for everyone. There's risks, but if you OC, you accept them. Same thing with CC, there's risks, you accept them. Same thing with carrying at all, risks, you accept them. Life too. Risks, you accept them. It's all about the risks and weighing them out.

As mentioned before in another thread, when I emailed the local sheriff about his stance on federal gun control, he said he wouldn't enforce it. In my letter, I gave my full name, address, permit number, even the type of gun I carry and that I do so openly. I doubt the sheriff went and told all the local cops about it, but I don't go around shouting in public that I carry, carry openly, or do anything to draw attention to myself, likewise, I also don't hide the fact I carry. Some people notice, many don't. Some try to be sly about it, others not so much. That's life.

I respect the fact that people choose to carry how they see fit. I'm just glad they do carry, as long as they do so legally. OC, CC, all good by me.

Anyway, if the local sheriff wants to come get me for OCing, he knows where I live. Should the time ever come where I get pulled over, I had my DL and PTC. I don't keep my wallet anywhere near my firearm so Officer Excitable won't get all hot 'n bothered. Can't say I blame the cops, they don't know me from Adam.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby Evad on Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:53 pm

XDM45 wrote: I guess it's a kind of a head-in-the-sand type of thing, like if they can't see it, then it doesn't exist. Weird.


Let's look at the average non-gun owner. It really can be "if I don't see it, it isn't there". I have literally heard EXACTLY that. People who aren't against carry...but if they see it they feel their safe world is not so safe. No one likes that. So, considering those people are out there...OC isn't 100% of the time the best thing for everyone.

I know you have your feelings and opinions like all of us do...I'm pointing out something I have heard from more than one person. They don't care if you carry...but if they see it they get nervous.

They really need someone to take them to the range IMO. They need to know guns aren't scary. Until they aren't afraid, they are afraid. If they are afraid, they won't go strike up a conversation with someone with a big bad gun on his hip.

So, my opinion on OC isn't the problem here. I don't personally care much. There are too many variables for me to say "here is a list of times and places it is ok".
Evad
 
Posts: 1054 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:21 am

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby meddin on Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:05 pm

I sorta want this thread to go on forever...
User avatar
meddin
 
Posts: 381 [View]
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:57 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby Evad on Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:10 pm

meddin wrote:I sorta want this thread to go on forever...


I didn't help. I forgot it was about ranges for a minute :lol:
Evad
 
Posts: 1054 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:21 am

Re: SPLIT ** General conversation about how ranges should be run

Postby xd ED on Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:11 pm

meddin wrote:I sorta want this thread to go on forever...

So far, it has.
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9195 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

PreviousNext

Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests

cron