New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Firearms related political discussion forum

New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby goda0301 on Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:37 pm

http://www.gunrights.mn/feds-cant-enfor ... tion-bill/

to bad it wont mean dick if they get the ******* state bills passed ...
User avatar
goda0301
 
Posts: 200 [View]
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:46 pm
Location: self employed

Re: New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby t140 on Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:44 pm

goda0301 wrote:http://www.gunrights.mn/feds-cant-enforce-new-laws-in-minnesota-says-new-firearms-protection-bill/

to bad it wont mean dick if they get the ******* state bills passed ...


I see this as a REALLY good sign.

Yes, we do still have HF241 to fight, but now we have pro-2A bills on the list. The more we have, the better. Look at how many the anti's have proposed, do you think they have a better or worse chance to pass one because of it?

Not to mention, there's a guaranteed 18 people to vote for this. Pay attention to who the co-authors are and who votes for this to pass. Reward them and make a huge point on election day.
t140
 
Posts: 174 [View]
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:12 pm
Location: W Metro

Re: New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby sansooshooter on Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:35 pm

Just became a citizen co sponsor of this bill. Sign up on their website.
Finally somebody is being proactive at the state capital.
sansooshooter
 
Posts: 418 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:33 am
Location: north of Andover

Re: New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby farmer44mag on Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:48 pm

I guess we can add DFLer Sundin to our side against the ban bills as he is co-sponsor of this.
Glocks-- 17,19,26 in 9mm and the 21 and 36 in .45auto-- S&W M&P Shield 9mm
Ruger LCP and LCR
Bolt and lever guns for deer
Buckmark and M@P .22 pistols for summer varmint carry
Mini-14 and Rem. 870 for all types of vermin.
farmer44mag
 
Posts: 69 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:21 pm

Re: New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby cgrant26 on Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:25 pm

While it's great to see some pro-2A bills introduced, I would be concerned they could be added the omnibus bill as a compromise to push through bad legislation. Stay vigilant Folks!
User avatar
cgrant26
 
Posts: 134 [View]
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:43 am

Re: New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby ASmith on Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:54 pm

Go Draz! He's my rep, gonna have to go shake his hand!
ASmith
 
Posts: 50 [View]
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:26 am

Re: New Bi-Partisan Firearms Protection Bill

Postby rugersol on Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:19 am

Representative Steve Drazkowski wrote:BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1. [624.7192] FIREARM PROTECTION ACT.

Subdivision 1. Definition.For purposes of this section, the term “new federal firearms law” means any act, law, statute, rule, regulation, or order by or under any authority of the United States Government that:

(1) is substantially and directly or indirectly related to any personal firearm, firearm magazine, other firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition that:

(i) was owned or possessed by a resident of Minnesota on the effective date of the federal act, law, statute, rule, regulation, or order, or its pertinent provision if different, and has thereafter remained exclusively within the borders of Minnesota; or

(ii) has been, is being, or will be manufactured commercially or privately in Minnesota and thereafter remains exclusively within the borders of Minnesota; or

(2) in any manner directly or indirectly requires the registration, licensing, listing, or enrollment of any firearm described by clause (1), or the identity of any person who owns or possesses any firearm described by clause (1).

Subd. 2. State’s rights; prohibition; penalty. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, rule, regulation, or order to the contrary, no person, including but not limited to any federal, state, or local governmental official, employee, or agent, shall enforce or attempt to enforce within this state any new federal firearms law, as defined in subdivision 1.

(b) Any person, including but not limited to any federal, state, or local governmental official, employee, or agent, who knowingly violates paragraph (a) is guilty of a felony, and may be punished by up to five years imprisonment and a $5,000 fine.

Subd. 3. Enforceability; new federal firearms law. Notwithstanding any other law, rule, regulation, or order to the contrary, no new federal firearms law shall be enforceable within the borders of the state of Minnesota if it is designed or attempts in any manner:

(1) to ban or restrict any personal firearm, firearm magazine, other firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition; or

(2) to require any personal firearm, firearm magazine, other firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition, or the owner of any personal firearm, firearm magazine, other firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition, to register or be licensed, listed, or enrolled in any direct or indirect manner by or with any federal, state, or local governmental department, agency, bureau, or official.


Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am


Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron