Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby Seismic Sam on Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:09 pm

The Democraps have decided to come ALL THE WAY out of the closet on "reasonable gun control" in Missouri, and I'm posting this here for whatever value it may have in discrediting thw Democratic effort in general. If that jackwad Akin can be held partly responsible for Romney loosing the election, then maybe it can work the other way around too.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/missouri-democrats-intruduce-legislation-to-confiscate-firearms-gives-gunowners-90-days-to-turn-in-guns
User avatar
Seismic Sam
Gone but not forgotten
 
Posts: 5515 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Pass By-You, Loosianana

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby LarryFlew on Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:52 pm

Dems in Komifornia doing a similar bill

http://offgridsurvival.com/californiato ... efirearms/
If you're having second thoughts you're two ahead of most Democrats
User avatar
LarryFlew
 
Posts: 5144 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Hamburg, MN - CZ fan - Class of 66 - USAF 66-70 - NRA life since 1970

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby JohnK87 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:16 pm

Anything short of confiscation now is just a step to confiscation later. Without a complete ban on firearms, turnins and mandatory penalties, you have no hope of reducing the firearms crime rate.

When the new law doesn't work, they'll pass another more restrictive law.
JohnK87
 
Posts: 10 [View]
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:23 am

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby sgruenhagen44 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:36 pm

ya can't fix stupid.
User avatar
sgruenhagen44
 
Posts: 894 [View]
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:49 pm
Location: Rockford

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby XDM45 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:00 pm

"Democraps" "libtards" "Komifornia", really guys, fine if you want to do that, but it doesn't help our cause.... in fact, it makes us look like a bunch of 12 year olds.

"He gonna take my guns. He's a poopy pants dunderhead and I'm gonna cry cause Mr Flickerstick is a libtard, Dumb, Freakin', Loser."

Really?

We as a community want to sound like that?

Yeah yeah yeah. I know "but I'm just one guy and I can say what I want, it's free speech" etc, is what people will say, ok, true... BUT just like when I OC, to John Q Public I AM the gun community. Even though I represent myself only as I go on about my business, you bet anything I say or do will apply to ALL gun owners, so yeah, I watch my butt for two reasons.... 1) I'm armed. 2) I want to represent myself in a good light. Of course I acknowledge the above said about me representing all gun owners to John Q Public, so there's a third one......3) I want to represent the gun community in a good light. The point I'm trying to make isn't about OC or carrying in general, it's about representation, intended or otherwise.

Unfair as it is to look at one person to represent the whole, but people do it.

When other people OC, it's done to them as well.
When other people hunt and someone sees a hunter, they ARE all hunters to John Q Public.

It's not just with guns, but many things. People don't look at the individual and say "Well, he was a nut job for shooting up that store with a stolen AR-15", no, they blame the gun and ALL AR-15s are black and evil....to them. People ought to not own them they will say.

We come across as effen idiots when we sit there and say stupid stuff like that. Why not make a shirt and says "My AR-15 is black, powerful and will defend my rights, unlike our President." You think I'd draw heat for OCing? Where THAT in public once. Equally offensive is the speech on here.

Search engines find things and index them. For example, https://www.google.com/search?q=site:mn ... %20libtard

Let Protect MN, the antis sound like 12 year olds on a playground, but we are more intelligent than that. Let's start acting like it, shall we?
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby xd ED on Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:08 pm

JohnK87 wrote:Anything short of confiscation now is just a step to confiscation later. Without a complete ban on firearms, turnins and mandatory penalties, you have no hope of reducing the firearms crime rate.

When the new law doesn't work, they'll pass another more restrictive law.



Really?
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9195 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby XDM45 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:10 pm

xd ED wrote:
JohnK87 wrote:Anything short of confiscation now is just a step to confiscation later. Without a complete ban on firearms, turnins and mandatory penalties, you have no hope of reducing the firearms crime rate.

When the new law doesn't work, they'll pass another more restrictive law.


Really?


People killed before guns and they will kill after them. Guns aren't the problem. Also, CBRN is pretty effective at killing more people than guns ever were.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby FJ540 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:01 am

"(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable;"

Some might say this is a solution to bad politicians. They should be careful what they ask for.
User avatar
FJ540
 
Posts: 6836 [View]
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Rock Ridge

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby Heffay on Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:20 am

XDM45 wrote:"Democraps" "libtards" "Komifornia", really guys, fine if you want to do that, but it doesn't help our cause.... in fact, it makes us look like a bunch of 12 year olds.


Yup. It's a convention of children around here.

Image
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby JustPlainT on Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:28 am

XDM45 wrote:Let Protect MN, the antis sound like 12 year olds on a playground, but we are more intelligent than that. Let's start acting like it, shall we?


This. ^^^

Please act like adults. There's no reason to lower ourselves to their level, and it will come back to bite us in the ass later.
Midwest Defense Institute, LLC
Quality Training at an Affordable Cost
User avatar
JustPlainT
 
Posts: 288 [View]
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:03 pm

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby 2in2out on Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:18 am

I think every progun speaker should have a picture of several founding fathers or a copy of the Bill of Rights on the table in front of them, similar to the emotion card the control people were trying to play during the House committee hearings.

Another thing that's really bothering me is their use of the term gun safety. We own that, having used it for decades to describe courses where new shooters are taught to handle firearms safely. I think this needs to be taken back from them. Common sense, gun safety, protecting Minnesotans from violence.... this is OUR domain. If they want to twist this all around in an attempt to gain the high ground, then we need to regain and hold it.

Control, confiscation and bans - this is THEIR domain, and it needs to be applied to them whenever possible.
"...the liberties of the American people were dependent upon the ballot-box, the jury-box, and the cartridge-box; that without these no class of people could live and flourish in this country..." ---Frederick Douglass
User avatar
2in2out
 
Posts: 1014 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:19 am
Location: SE MN

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby sansooshooter on Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:35 am

2in2out wrote:I think every progun speaker should have a picture of several founding fathers or a copy of the Bill of Rights on the table in front of them, similar to the emotion card the control people were trying to play during the House committee hearings.

Another thing that's really bothering me is their use of the term gun safety. We own that, having used it for decades to describe courses where new shooters are taught to handle firearms safely. I think this needs to be taken back from them. Common sense, gun safety, protecting Minnesotans from violence.... this is OUR domain. If they want to twist this all around in an attempt to gain the high ground, then we need to regain and hold it.

Control, confiscation and bans - this is THEIR domain, and it needs to be applied to them whenever possible.


BINGO !!! You SIR are making sense.
Bravo.
I will keep this in mind . When talking to people who are not on our side yet!
sansooshooter
 
Posts: 418 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:33 am
Location: north of Andover

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby Heffay on Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:37 am

2in2out wrote:I think every progun speaker should have a picture of several founding fathers or a copy of the Bill of Rights on the table in front of them, similar to the emotion card the control people were trying to play during the House committee hearings.


I don't think that will have the impact you think it will. It's not the same as a picture of a dead 5 year old.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby XDM45 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:48 am

Heffay wrote:
2in2out wrote:I think every progun speaker should have a picture of several founding fathers or a copy of the Bill of Rights on the table in front of them, similar to the emotion card the control people were trying to play during the House committee hearings.


I don't think that will have the impact you think it will. It's not the same as a picture of a dead 5 year old.


How about a photo of a dead 5 year old with a parent asking why they can't defend their family by owning guns, and now their child is dead..... I bet that would work. Take the most stringent anti-gun person, give htem a choice of which to use to protect thier child, a cell phone or a gun and I'd bet they grab the gun, not the phone.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: Talking point: What "reasonable gun control" REALLY means

Postby Heffay on Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:49 am

XDM45 wrote:How about a photo of a dead 5 year old with a parent asking why they can't defend their family by owning guns, and now their child is dead..... I bet that would work. Take the most stringent anti-gun person, give htem a choice of which to use to protect thier child, a cell phone or a gun and I'd bet they grab the gun, not the phone.


Much better. And they can even use the "if it saves just one life" argument too, as a rebuttal to when the gun control proponents use it.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Next

Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron