ForeverTwoWheels wrote:It may be the law under the strictest reading of the applicable statutes but I think it's a little illogical. Oh well. I have to get my MN to renew my UT anyway, of course Dakota wants the full $100 to give me permission to exercise my "rights".
ForeverTwoWheels wrote:It may be the law under the strictest reading of the applicable statutes but I think it's a little illogical. Oh well. I have to get my MN to renew my UT anyway, of course Dakota wants the full $100 to give me permission to exercise my "rights".
Squib Joe wrote:The law requires that a transferee have proof that a background check has been conducted by a Minnesota law enforcement agency ( MN 624.7131 ). This is something that the Utah instructors would seldom bring up when selling their classes.
XDM45 wrote:ForeverTwoWheels wrote:It may be the law under the strictest reading of the applicable statutes but I think it's a little illogical. Oh well. I have to get my MN to renew my UT anyway, of course Dakota wants the full $100 to give me permission to exercise my "rights".
Is $100 really that much money?
mrp wrote:XDM45 wrote:ForeverTwoWheels wrote:It may be the law under the strictest reading of the applicable statutes but I think it's a little illogical. Oh well. I have to get my MN to renew my UT anyway, of course Dakota wants the full $100 to give me permission to exercise my "rights".
Is $100 really that much money?
Don't ignore the cost of the mandatory training. And for many people, getting to the courthouse during business hours may be more than just a small hassle. And don't forget to include $50 for the ammo you need for the live fire portion.
tman wrote:JohnGageMN wrote:Probably because Minnesota law can be interpreted to only allow a MN permit to function as a permit to purchase. Here's the applicable statute:
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=624.7131624.7131 wrote:Subd. 9.Permit to carry.
A valid permit to carry issued pursuant to section 624.714 constitutes a transferee permit for the purposes of this section and section 624.7132.
A permit issued by another state is not issued pursuant to the Minnesota statute.
This.
Any sale by an FFL that doesn't follow the MN law is a crime.
Pretty simple, really.
Sent from my iPhone using that app which shall not be named.
crbutler wrote:About this time frame I began to look on Glock owners as being incestuous relatives of Lucifer.
leprechaun50 wrote:"Meeker county just lowered their PTC I believe. Honestly, I'm not one for wasting money, but a MN PTC in most places is $100 and it's good for 5 years during which time you can both carry and buy pistols. $100 isn't anything really. Heck, that breaks down to $20.00 a year or 0.054 a day for a year. I can drop $100 going out to dinner and a movie. It's just not that expensive for what you get really. Would I like it if PTCs were free? Sure, of course, why not? It's not like they cost $1,000."
Forgot to throw in the cost of having to retake the training class before reapplying.
ForeverTwoWheels wrote:It may be the law under the strictest reading of the applicable statutes but I think it's a little illogical. Oh well. I have to get my MN to renew my UT anyway, of course Dakota wants the full $100 to give me permission to exercise my "rights".
Drizzle wrote:ForeverTwoWheels wrote:It may be the law under the strictest reading of the applicable statutes but I think it's a little illogical. Oh well. I have to get my MN to renew my UT anyway, of course Dakota wants the full $100 to give me permission to exercise my "rights".
So you have a MN PTC and for some reason want to show a UT non resident PTC to buy a weapon in MN and are upset when the stores tell you no? I assume you stood on principle and didn't show them your MN PTC, so you couldn't buy what you wanted. And then you came on here to complain about it. Does that about cover it? Do you also try to write out of state checks for large grocery purchases, and then leave a cart full at the checkout when the store won't accept your check, even though you have cash and a credit card? Sounds like you make your life harder than it needs to be.
Chunkychuck wrote:The bigger question is, If i can pass the NICS background check why should it matter if i have a PTP, PTC or even be a resident of the state where I am purchasing the firearm when I am purchasing from an FFL?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests