Read the whole article:
https://blog.christopherburg.com/2014/0 ... -shooters/
...and discuss...
One thing is certain: these new shooters don’t like the NRA and they aren’t members. They don’t know the organization because the organization hasn’t taken the time to know them. What they believe they know about the NRA and its members comes from the mainstream media, because too many members have decided that these new shooters aren’t worth getting to know as human beings.
(Frankly, the organization’s social stances haven’t helped, either. Seriously, look at the major social activities planned for the NRA convention later this month: a country music concert and a prayer breakfast. Do you really think these people are going to be excited about either?)
bensdad wrote:Garbage from a self-important twit. This idiot repeatedly uses derogatory words to describe conservatives, makes fun of their beliefs and derides religion. Oh, but then he condescendingly informs them that they are fools if they don't drop their guard a bit. "Childish" is about the kindest way I can describe that.
Also, at some point, the topic he THINKS he's writing about, is not the topic he's writing about. 20 % of an article dedicated to describing himself and his apparently amazing girlfriend (funky hair, big degree, govt. clearance - yeah, we're impressed already) is enough to obliterate the substance of the message he thought he was sending.
Shipyard wrote:no kidding. that guy gets banned from here more than i quit this place
Shipyard wrote:bensdad wrote:Garbage from a self-important twit. This idiot repeatedly uses derogatory words to describe conservatives, makes fun of their beliefs and derides religion. Oh, but then he condescendingly informs them that they are fools if they don't drop their guard a bit. "Childish" is about the kindest way I can describe that.
Also, at some point, the topic he THINKS he's writing about, is not the topic he's writing about. 20 % of an article dedicated to describing himself and his apparently amazing girlfriend (funky hair, big degree, govt. clearance - yeah, we're impressed already) is enough to obliterate the substance of the message he thought he was sending.
if anyones is this upset by the article - i'd ask you to think for about 20 minutes about WHY - you're probably exactly the type of person who inspired this article to be written. if you're feelign that challenged, i invite you to explore why...
point i'll concede: author of this article is a douche and a self-important vanity whore.
point i'llput out there as 100% legitimate: dude does a good point of illustrating how a LARGE portion of the new generation of shooters (20-35 yr old) are excluded from the "mainstream" gun rights community. i can identify a lot of what's in there. i'm tattoo'd as hell, grew up in the puck rock scene and i'm about as excited about the republican (or democrat for that matter) party than i am a swift kick in the nuts. and i love me some guns son.
i support gay marriage, heavy metal music, conceal carry, legal weed and assisted suicide.
i absolutely oppose expanded background checks, firearm registration, your church getting tax breaks and teaching any of that crationism and abstenance only garbage in schools.
i agree: i also want absolutely nothing to do with anything remotely associated with country music and prayer breakfasts. there is SO MUCH in the NRA magaizine that i could give two craps about every month. if you believe everything i nthere the south is the only cool part of the nation and if you ain't country you wnat Obama to kill babies.
forget about any douchey argeuments concerning anarchism and colored hair - the fact remains that most gun supporters and "conservatives" are doing a STELLAR job of making themselves irrellivent to the conversation and to new generations of people who support gun rights.
and just WHEN the **** did it become a pre-requisite to be conservative in order to support gun rights anyways?
Shipyard wrote:bensdad wrote:Garbage from a self-important twit. This idiot repeatedly uses derogatory words to describe conservatives, makes fun of their beliefs and derides religion. Oh, but then he condescendingly informs them that they are fools if they don't drop their guard a bit. "Childish" is about the kindest way I can describe that.
Also, at some point, the topic he THINKS he's writing about, is not the topic he's writing about. 20 % of an article dedicated to describing himself and his apparently amazing girlfriend (funky hair, big degree, govt. clearance - yeah, we're impressed already) is enough to obliterate the substance of the message he thought he was sending.
if anyones is this upset by the article - i'd ask you to think for about 20 minutes about WHY - you're probably exactly the type of person who inspired this article to be written. if you're feelign that challenged, i invite you to explore why...
point i'll concede: author of this article is a douche and a self-important vanity whore.
point i'llput out there as 100% legitimate: dude does a good point of illustrating how a LARGE portion of the new generation of shooters (20-35 yr old) are excluded from the "mainstream" gun rights community. i can identify a lot of what's in there. i'm tattoo'd as hell, grew up in the puck rock scene and i'm about as excited about the republican (or democrat for that matter) party than i am a swift kick in the nuts. and i love me some guns son.
i support gay marriage, heavy metal music, conceal carry, legal weed and assisted suicide.
i absolutely oppose expanded background checks, firearm registration, your church getting tax breaks and teaching any of that crationism and abstenance only garbage in schools.
i agree: i also want absolutely nothing to do with anything remotely associated with country music and prayer breakfasts. there is SO MUCH in the NRA magaizine that i could give two craps about every month. if you believe everything i nthere the south is the only cool part of the nation and if you ain't country you wnat Obama to kill babies.
forget about any douchey argeuments concerning anarchism and colored hair - the fact remains that most gun supporters and "conservatives" are doing a STELLAR job of making themselves irrellivent to the conversation and to new generations of people who support gun rights.
and just WHEN the **** did it become a pre-requisite to be conservative in order to support gun rights anyways?
Rip Van Winkle wrote:My thoughts echo Bensdad’s. While I won’t go so far as calling the self important darling’s opinion garbage, I will say he needs to grow up. Too many of the “Millennial Generation” seem to think all they have to do is show up somewhere and when acceptance, respect and love isn’t showered upon them they get their delicate little feelings hurt.
I remember in my misspent youth, back when I knew everything, not being accepted by my father’s generation. The difference between then and now is I knew I had to earn their respect, it wasn't just going to be bestowed upon me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests