MJY65 wrote:It's interesting that the antis are using the profit motive of manufacturers as a reason against legalization. So a company wants to sell a product that people want to buy. So what???
You're not a liberal, are you.
MJY65 wrote:It's interesting that the antis are using the profit motive of manufacturers as a reason against legalization. So a company wants to sell a product that people want to buy. So what???
Ranb wrote:I watched online while at work in WA. As expected the opposition had little more than hate and lies to support their argument. Too bad we did not have more individuals instead of business/organization representatives speaking. Anyone know if other people showed up but did not speak? Lots of repetition in the pro side. Knox Williams suggested an air rifle can be more powerful than 22lr subsonic. Not a good claim to make unless speaking of the larger caliber air rifles especially by an industry representative.
Randy
xd ED wrote:
I suspect there will be some rebuttals, and additional commentary at the evening session, as there was some discussion amongst the committee about of a lack of qualified medical evidence as to the hearing health benefits.
PhilaBOR wrote:MJY65 wrote:It's interesting that the antis are using the profit motive of manufacturers as a reason against legalization. So a company wants to sell a product that people want to buy. So what???
You're not a liberal, are you.
Kelor wrote:Heather: "Silencers were designed to commit murder and get away with it"
Kelor wrote:Then we have the physician who couldn't figure out how to use the parking meter. To paraphrase: "Even though you are suggesting that lower decibals are better for your ears, we might find out later that scientific fact is wrong."
Kelor wrote:Ahh. Yes. I am a Mac guy. The audio worked and the video worked until the gavel sounded.
Any idea how long the hearings will go this afternoon?
Back when the Temperance movement was promoting prohibition, they claimed that the saloons and distilleries were behind all opposition to banning alcohol.MJY65 wrote:It's interesting that the antis are using the profit motive of manufacturers as a reason against legalization. So a company wants to sell a product that people want to buy. So what???
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests