I thought it was well known that it is meters not yards.
If that little bit if difference is throwing his data off I want to meet this guy. He must be an incredibly good shot and an impeccably precise reloader.
Snowgun wrote:So, i know all about the fact that the 200 yd range is secretly a 200m range, and that oakdale has it mislabeled. But a buddy of mine apparently has been trying to work loads up there for 3 years before someone told him it was "off".
He is livid. (Im ashamed to admit i thought this was hilarious). He was going crazy wondering why all his calculations were wrong.
farmerj wrote:Sounds more like an anal retentive engineer type whose math calculations weren't matching real life.
selurcspi wrote:For 16.6 yards at 200, suck it up buttercup. What are we talking about an 1/8"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
cobb wrote:If this rifle is for use in the field, what difference would it make? If he can't eyeball that the range is 218 feet and not 200 at Oakdale, how is he going to be able to range estimate that accurately in the field.
OldmanFCSA wrote:cobb wrote:If this rifle is for use in the field, what difference would it make? If he can't eyeball that the range is 218 feet and not 200 at Oakdale, how is he going to be able to range estimate that accurately in the field.
FEET
YARDS
METERS
Who cares.
BOLD & Underline edited by me to point to error. We all make them.
yuppiejr wrote:
hammAR wrote:Getting sloppy Slurpie..............it is 3.1750 mm on a 200m range ...............
yuppiejr wrote:.. unless the bad guy is an angry Leprechaun or small drone.
Return to Leagues And Shooting Clubs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests