870TC wrote:with 110-150 grain bullets I use any G.I. mag or Lancer, Magpul. Its generally only with bullets heavier than this where you have issues and could benefit from a 300AAC specific mag.= Lancer, Magpul, D&H, would be my choice
This.
For the light weight supers (up to 150 grain) any stanag mag will work. I’ve never had a problem with magpul, fwiw. As the bullets get longer and heavier, some feeding problems can occur. If running subs, particularly 220gr missiles, I have encountered some feeding issues. My own testing says it’s more weight related than OAL. If I download a mag to say 20 rounds, the springs have enough pressure to feed properly. That’s been my experience. Much more than 20/22, and I don’t believe the springs are designed to push up bullets that weigh 4 times the amount they were originally designed for. Magpul created 300blk specific mags that delete the internal rib/seam that allow unfettered feeding. I’ll admit I haven’t bought/tested any. But if they haven’t designed different springs, they’d be ineffective for subsonic rounds, IMO. If anyone has different experiences, I’d love to hear it.
Edit to address the 40 round pmags- I own some and are a no go with 300blk, IMO. Way too much weight when filled to capacity, no matter the grain weight of the projectile. I own only 3, but have had poor performance with all 3.