dismal wrote:Mistrial yet again, yet to be seen if they try him a third time.
https://www.postbulletin.com/news/publi ... 133ba.html
Interseting
dismal wrote:Mistrial yet again, yet to be seen if they try him a third time.
https://www.postbulletin.com/news/publi ... 133ba.html
Holland&Holland wrote:dismal wrote:Mistrial yet again, yet to be seen if they try him a third time.
https://www.postbulletin.com/news/publi ... 133ba.html
Interseting
xd ED wrote:At what point does the state's inability to convince a jury to convict someone, become a de facto acquittal?
Rip Van Winkle wrote:xd ED wrote:At what point does the state's inability to convince a jury to convict someone, become a de facto acquittal?
Perhaps a better question is, at what point does it become a political vendetta?
dismal wrote:Apparently mistrial doesn’t trigger double jeopardy, so they can play the game until they get the results that they want (or he does get acquitted).
Based on the prosecutor’s comments in the news, I suspect that he’s feeling pressure to try the case again. But we’ll see next month.
MJY65 wrote:I rarely travel in Downtown MSP, but have always considered how totally screwed a middle aged white guy would be if he had to shoot an urban youth in self defense.
Holland&Holland wrote:MJY65 wrote:I rarely travel in Downtown MSP, but have always considered how totally screwed a middle aged white guy would be if he had to shoot an urban youth in self defense.
You mean a raging racist shooting a felon just turning his life around?
MJY65 wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:MJY65 wrote:I rarely travel in Downtown MSP, but have always considered how totally screwed a middle aged white guy would be if he had to shoot an urban youth in self defense.
You mean a raging racist shooting a felon just turning his life around?
Sounds about right. I think that being from outside the Metro would confer that status upon me automatically.
In a statement announcing the dismissal, Olmsted County Attorney Mark Ostrem called the decision to drop the charges “difficult.”
“It is a difficult decision, telling a family we cannot move forward to bring justice for a loved one’s death,” Ostrem wrote, adding the move does not dismiss the validity of the case or establish Weiss’s guilt or innocence.
“I believe strongly that Mr. Weiss’s decision to shoot Muhammed Rahim was unjustified," Ostrem wrote. "The law requires that deadly force be employed only after attempts to avoid danger have been made and there is no other option.”
xd ED wrote:Or could it be that his personal and/ or professional assessment is based on an agenda, as opposed to the law, and reality of the situation, and only his concern for his track record is in play?
mrp wrote:Ghost wrote:Is my window sticker subtle enough?
Surprised nobody has done this to it yet...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests