Lumpy wrote:Recently I read the claim that under MN law Curios and Relics are an exception to the prohibition on owning full-auto firearms (besides law enforcement and licensed gun dealers). Is this correct, that in MN I can own a functioning full-auto firearm as long as it meets the ATF definition of a C&R?
crbutler wrote:Kind of sort of.
Firstly, they don’t treat them as curios and relics, they are treated as class III weapons, so a c&r license does not authorize transfer.
If you do get one you also have to register it with the state BCA.
One thing that I find kind of curious about the whole c&r thing is it’s a specific list, sometimes down to specific serial numbers… even though by now ANYTHING legally transferable to individuals is more than 30 years out, most much more so.
Lumpy wrote:Which leads me to another question: how much can a C&R be refurbished or repaired before it would no longer be considered the same gun; i.e. the "Ship of Theseus" question?
warrlac wrote:crbutler wrote:Kind of sort of.
Firstly, they don’t treat them as curios and relics, they are treated as class III weapons, so a c&r license does not authorize transfer.
If you do get one you also have to register it with the state BCA.
One thing that I find kind of curious about the whole c&r thing is it’s a specific list, sometimes down to specific serial numbers… even though by now ANYTHING legally transferable to individuals is more than 30 years out, most much more so.
I have a C&R FFL. It is my understanding that the ATF did away with any sort of list quite a few years ago.
The magic number is 50 years old. For example, that means that a 1973 Browning Auto-5 could be transferred as a C&R firearm today.
Note that many Sellers refuse to sell them as C&R items and make you go through a Type 1 FFL anyway. There are advantages to having a C&R when it comes to bidding on vintage military firearms (sometime sold in lots at auction).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests