The issue isn’t that folks aren’t going to acknowledge that Trump has warts or is boorish.
It’s that they thought Biden, and then his selected surrogate Harris were worse.
Your point that Trump has flaws is accurate and I think most here would acknowledge that.
The problem is your posting gives the impression that you think everyone should vote for Harris because “she hasn’t done anything against the second amendment.”
Playing subtle semantic games and then objecting when the basic thrust of your argument is pointed out and disagreed with is not a polite debate tactic.
I’ve said lots negative about Trump, but I always preface it with the oppositions goals as stated are against my principles.
This last election where Trump won by a substantial margin showed that most are not happy with the democrats and their policies. That Trump won despite his issues should be a big warning to the democrats that they are not in step with the populace (just like Biden’s win should show the GOP that a lot of Trump’s support is not very deep and they need to not double down on things like abortion or big spending…)
Ranb wrote:If Trump is a badly behaved boor, but it has little to do with how well he can run the country, then why can't a judge call someone a rapist and still serve the bench honorably?
If Trump does not agree, let him bring suit against the judge or take other steps. But the same person who could not be bothered to put Clinton in prison after promising to do so, will take no action against any judge that calls him a rapist.
" - Markemp - 2/18/24
