Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby justaguy on Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:12 am

Glocks are Saturday Night Specials!?!

What the hell am I supposed to do with them? I cant sell them, I cant have them? I guess I will have to move.
WWTNSTKBLD
(What Would The Navy SEALs That Killed Bin Laden Do)
justaguy
 
Posts: 7402 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:37 pm
Location: Minnesota?

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby DeanC on Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:16 am

:stirthepot:
Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.
User avatar
DeanC
 
Posts: 8502 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:22 am
Location: Captain Cufflinks

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby White Horseradish on Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:06 am

Considering that Hi-Point managed to make a cheap gun and not hit the SNS statute, I wouldn't worry too much about it. As a crime-fighting measure it's a fail, but from consumer protection standpoint it's not too bad.
"I have come to kick a** and chew bubblegum." <racks shotgun> "And I'm all out of bubblegum."

--John Nada, "They Live"
User avatar
White Horseradish
 
Posts: 1748 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: NE Minneapolis

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby EJSG19 on Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:19 pm

I don't mind if pistols/revolvers are cheap, but I do think they should be held to higher standards. If that means they cost more then so be it.

I've been around a few Hi-Points and Jennings' and none, I repeat none have worked with basic factory loaded ammo.

How can unreliable products be sold so readily? Cars have the lemon law. Shouldn't firearms? I've often thought that it would be nice if gun manufacturers were held to a higher standard for quality of their products. I'd love to see the QC reports at Hi-Point or Jennings and hear what they have to say in regard to their products' reliability records.

If a gun won't run on 80% of the common store-bought, factory ammo, then I'm thinking it shouldn't be allowed to be sold. Most buyers of firearms aren't the type to diagnose, test, and remedy the problem.

:hide: :hide:
EJSG19


"Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt."
User avatar
EJSG19
 
Posts: 3931 [View]
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: Greene Co, IA

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:42 pm

justaguy wrote:I guess I will have to move.


:woohoo:
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby MrVvrroomm on Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:05 pm

Seismic Sam wrote:The polymer Glocks are made out of is a variant of nylon, and I doubt it could withstand much more than 400 or 500 degrees F. Put a Glock in a 1,000 muffle furnace, and what you will get out are steel parts and some lumps of carbon.

You're pretty close. Glock frames are made from a "hybrid polymer mix with a base of Nylon 6". It's not 100% Nylon 6. Googling a bit told me that Nylon 6 is good up to about 220 degrees C, 428 degrees F.

I gotta remember to keep my Glocks away from the inside of a 1000 degree muffle furnace.
May I assume you're not here to inquire about the alcohol or the tobacco?

Certified Glock Armorer

engnerdan wrote:First he beat me up on the price. Then he made me deliver it. Then he made me drive to Roseville to pick up my money.
User avatar
MrVvrroomm
Changed
 
Posts: 2266 [View]
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Shakopee, MN USA

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby tacticalninja32 on Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:03 pm

MrVvrroomm wrote:
I gotta remember to keep my Glocks away from the inside of a 1000 degree muffle furnace.

Or sit too close to the fireplace,
Blood makes the grass grow
User avatar
tacticalninja32
 
Posts: 2119 [View]
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: South side metro

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby Q_Continuum on Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:10 pm

There was a gun show video I watched (something recent, watched it about 6 months ago - current show) and they took a Springfield XD and threw it in a grill for awhile, then shot it.
Q_Continuum
 
Posts: 133 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:07 am

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby Wadero on Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:25 pm

Stradawhovious wrote:
justaguy wrote:I guess I will have to move.


:woohoo:



My thoughts exactly Strad.
“You were born free, you got f***ed out of half of it, and you wave a flag celebrating it.” -- Doug Stanhope
User avatar
Wadero
 
Posts: 706 [View]
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: Free Ace and Brit! Take One!

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby mattxd on Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:42 pm

just guessing here. But my first thought was that a gun with a melting point around 1000f would be very easy to absolutely destroy, remember back in high school getting ride of you empty can in the bonfire.
"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state lives at the expense of everyone." -- Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) Source: The Law, by Frederic Bastiat, 1850
Go ahead report me to Barry!!
User avatar
mattxd
 
Posts: 403 [View]
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:37 pm

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby mnglocker on Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:52 pm

mattxd wrote:just guessing here. But my first thought was that a gun with a melting point around 1000f would be very easy to absolutely destroy, remember back in high school getting ride of you empty can in the bonfire.



**** man, we used to melt wine bottles. :twisted:
-Get a rope Tuco.
What happens in the basement stays in the basement.


http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
mnglocker
 
Posts: 4722 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:25 am

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby White Horseradish on Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:12 pm

EJSG19 wrote:I don't mind if pistols/revolvers are cheap, but I do think they should be held to higher standards. If that means they cost more then so be it.

I've been around a few Hi-Points and Jennings' and none, I repeat none have worked with basic factory loaded ammo.

How can unreliable products be sold so readily? Cars have the lemon law. Shouldn't firearms? I've often thought that it would be nice if gun manufacturers were held to a higher standard for quality of their products. I'd love to see the QC reports at Hi-Point or Jennings and hear what they have to say in regard to their products' reliability records.

If a gun won't run on 80% of the common store-bought, factory ammo, then I'm thinking it shouldn't be allowed to be sold. Most buyers of firearms aren't the type to diagnose, test, and remedy the problem.

:hide: :hide:
I used to have a Hi-Point. It ran WWB with no problems whatsoever.
"I have come to kick a** and chew bubblegum." <racks shotgun> "And I'm all out of bubblegum."

--John Nada, "They Live"
User avatar
White Horseradish
 
Posts: 1748 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: NE Minneapolis

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby mitchx3 on Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:49 pm

EJSG19 wrote:I've been around a few Hi-Points and Jennings' and none, I repeat none have worked with basic factory loaded ammo.


I think that may have something to do with the owners' level of interest/knowledge in firearms. A lot of people never shoot more than a box through their guns, this is more likely so with owners of cheap guns. I have no doubt that most of the members here could take an off the shelf [anything] and have it working well after 1 or 2 range sessions.
User avatar
mitchx3
 
Posts: 943 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:26 am

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby EJSG19 on Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:45 am

mitchx3 wrote:
EJSG19 wrote:I've been around a few Hi-Points and Jennings' and none, I repeat none have worked with basic factory loaded ammo.


I think that may have something to do with the owners' level of interest/knowledge in firearms. A lot of people never shoot more than a box through their guns, this is more likely so with owners of cheap guns. I have no doubt that most of the members here could take an off the shelf [anything] and have it working well after 1 or 2 range sessions.


Right, but that is the point. Most member's here know what they're doing much more than the average gun owner, is my guess.

Joe Blow who doesn't own a single gun, goes into the gun shop and buys a Jennings because he thinks he'll save a dollar. Gun doesn't run, and maybe he doesn't even shoot it enough to figure that out. Day comes around where he really needs it, and low and behold it won't fire/cycle/whatever.

I have no worries about 75% of the members here being able to get a gun running. But we're all sort of in the Choir. The congregation is who I'm talking about.

p.s. I've never owned a jennings or a hi-point, just going off of anecdotal evidence, and that of what I've seen firsthand at the range and with friends.
EJSG19


"Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt."
User avatar
EJSG19
 
Posts: 3931 [View]
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: Greene Co, IA

Re: Banned in Minnesota -- huh?

Postby Stradawhovious on Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:42 am

I owned a Jennings .22 for a while, and it ran like a champ.

FWIW, IANAL, YMMV, IIRC, LOL, FTW.
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

PreviousNext

Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron