macphisto wrote:I like the idea of the M2, but I'm having trouble looking past the myriad negative reviews on Midway citing everything from unintuitive user interface to reliability issues.
Well I will say there is some truth to the intuitive comments, this device does have MANY features and to really get the most out of it you will have to RTFM. Trying to man up and wing it without doing so will leave you scratching, but its by no means hopeless. As far as quality goes I would say its above par, at least from what I’ve seen. My friend is a chronic chrono user, other than match’s he fires EVERY single round over is CED M1, I bet its seen 20-30K rounds. Even after hundreds of trips to the range it measures almost exactly the same as my newer M2. I also feel the velocities it gives are very close to actual. I will often go from my 100yd zero to 600 yard targets and using Bryan litz’s real world BC’s and chrono data from my M2 I can be just about perfect, twice this year I’ve hit the X ring on a cold bore shot, that just wouldn’t happen with bad data. My older chrono use to give me data that I questioned, the solutions never worked, I was often low indicating it was giving data that was higher that actual. Using the data from my friends M1 I’ve personally seen 3 one shot kills on Prairie dogs @ 1000 yards and over, again, those results don’t happen unless the data you are using is VERY good. Like I said, I’ve met people that have shelved every other model listed here, I’ve yet to meet a competent shooter that has done such with a M2, not saying they are perfect but from my completely antidotal evidence they seem to be the best out there.
Also lets face it guys, there are plenty of "Bubbas" in this hobby, and Bubbas don't often mix with tech, so you may want to keep that in mind when reading the Midway reviews.