Evo wrote:Hmac what serial prefix is your gen 3. Is it M or later? Have you called Glock? I know some later gen 3s they have replaced the ejectors with the new upgraded ejectors.
Also have you tried hotter and heavier ammo?
I can't recall the serial number, but it was test-fired in April of 2012 according to the fired casing that came with it. From what I have read, the problem with the recent Gen 3's appears to be the extractor rather than the ejector. This issue is causing quite the hubbub on some of the firearms forums and there is quite a bit of teeth-gnashing over MIM's and DIPs and a variety of other configurations of the extractor. Randy Lee at Apex Tactical has kind of become the champion of the issue and has summarized his take on the problem in a dissertation on M4Carbine
http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=92447 . Bottom line is that it appears that the solution to erratic ejection in the later Gen 3's is maybe a re-designed extractor, and perhaps lowering the ejector port, or some combination thereof. While I find the ejection issue to be annoying, I don't consider it a deal-breaker. The gun shoots well, and with the 18# recoil spring has been completely reliable in its lack of FTE.
I haven't tried hotter ammo, only 115gr PMC Bronze. That's what I shoot, and while I agree that trying the hotter ammo might be interesting, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect this handgun to perform acceptably with standard commerical ammo. Both of my other 9mm's do. I realize that I could send it to Glock and that they'd do something to it, but the results of others that have done so have been mixed and apparently not universally satisfactory.
I keep looking at the thread on M4C and am waiting for the flurry of posts that indicate that Randy Lee has solved the problem with some piece of hardware or another, if and whenever that occurs. In the meantime, I continue to carry and shoot the G19 despite this little ejection idiosyncracy.