It was a major debacle. We all show up, I was dissapointed there weren't MORE PEOPLE WHO CARE ENOUGH TO SHOW UP, and the meeting started. The overhead projector wouldn't work, It got it going later, but the upshot was that there wasn't anything concrete for us to look at ON PAPER. The original decision to go from 13 voted directors to 5 + the President had already met with enough criticism that it had been rescinded, although curiously, the new number of directors was 12 and not 13, as listed in the 2007 by-laws. Turns out the building and grounds director position (Jerry Marah) has just drifted away somehow, and Jerry stated that after retiring from the position, he still did the work until Stan Durda told him verbally that he wasn't needed anymore! Another member pointed out that as far as assets of the club is concerned, the buildings and LAND are the most valuable things the club owns, so getting rid of B&G really didn't make any sense.
So there we were, with nothing on paper about what changes were being proposed to the by-laws that we could compare to the 2007 edition, and the board members present admitted they didn't have their ducks in a row. WTF?? We wre told that the only extant "Gold" copy was under a director's pillow, and he didn't attend the meeting or bring the copy. Yes, that's what was actually told to us. So this goes around and around, until one member brings up the fact that he had made a movement at the last meeting that had been seconded and passed that the current effort to make changes be TABLED until such time as printed changes shown next to the 2007 manual had been distributed to ALL members. So there we are, the movement from the previous meeting clearly invalidated anything we could have tried to do even if we had gone along with voting on thin air instead of printed paper, and the wrangling continued. There was all sorts of stuff about trying to rush this whole thing through so it can get voted on in the December General Meeting, and with the current issue formally tabled, there was no way in hell that this could happen even if people wanted it to, which they clearly didn't.
The meeting ended on a particularly peculiar note, as THE IT DIRECTOR asked everybody if there was ANY way that this could go forward to get completed by December's meeting, and the answer was ANOTHER resounding NO!!! Now think about this: That might be a valid question coming from the President (absent) or Vice President (absent), but the young IT director who's been around for about two years??
So the frustration continues, there is nothing in writing relating the 2007 manual to proposed changes except under somebody's pillow, and there is a continued desire by some board members to try and go ahead with thin air, and that's in direct contravention of a made, seconded, and passed resolution at the last meeting. Seeing as I have been involved in writing and changing AAMI Medical National Standards and IEC 60601-2-2 International Medical Standards since 1991, I'm sufficiently honked off that I'm contemplating offering my services to chair the updating of the current by-laws with the written process that I am familiar with, because what really needs to happen is that we need to get our horribly vague by-laws better defined before we can really go forward with anything else. I fankly don't care what the changes should be, but I know how to go through the process IN WRITING with written rationales appended to EVERY change and voted upon that will stand up to any audit, and specifically an FDA audit, and leave a permanent paper trail behind for all to see.