this guy is a real genius, ya know? seriously people. what he did was brandishing a firearm, and it really was 2nd Degree Assault with a Firearm. i think the guy also truly believed that what he was doing was the right thing to do!
however, let's get back to Lunchbox's previous question, was it an AK-47 or was it something else? if the charges were specific enough to claim that he drew an AK-47 and it was an AK-74, would he be acquitted?