Why 10 rds

Firearms related political discussion forum

Re: Why 10 rds

Postby Rmfcasey on Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:07 am

20 1/2 LOL
Rmfcasey
Rmfcasey
The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Rmfcasey
 
Posts: 67 [View]
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:43 am
Location: Winona County

Re: Why 10 rds

Postby JustMe on Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:55 pm

Could there have been inspiration from Canada's laws for capacities of pistol magazines with U.S. politicians?
I thought that after Marc Lepine's mass murders at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal in 1989 (with a Ruger Mini 14 that had a 20 or 30 round magazine), that the capacity for pistols was limited to 10 rounds and 5 rounds for rifles under the 1995 Firearms Act (although I don't know if there is a distinction/exemption between integral magazines and detachable ones in the law). And I don't know if magazines of more than 5 or 10 rounds capacity that were owned previously to the laws had to be forfeited by the owners.
JustMe
 
Posts: 64 [View]
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:10 pm

Re: Why 10 rds

Postby CraigJS on Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:00 pm

Why 10rds.
They only have 10 fingers...Dah!
CraigJS
 
Posts: 642 [View]
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:58 am

Previous

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron