Holland&Holland wrote:I guess you can not read then. The original post made statements of gay marriage. My question is what does that have to do with gun control?
Heffay wrote:As if we can't understand your sekrit code words...
BigBlue wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:I guess you can not read then. The original post made statements of gay marriage. My question is what does that have to do with gun control?
I guess I can't read either then, because I don't see what you are talking about in the OP. The OP was about the anti's and their true intentions.
BB
Holland&Holland wrote:I guess you can not read then. The original post made statements of gay marriage.
LePetomane wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:I guess you can not read then. The original post made statements of gay marriage.
I can read just fine, Mr. (or Mrs.) Holland & Holland. Maybe the mention of gay marriage exists in your vivid imagination but it isn't in the original post. And before labeling someone as illiterate you would do well to invest in a spell check. It's spelled conservative, not "conservitive" as per your post. Maybe you need to educate yourself.
Holland&Holland wrote:LePetomane wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:I guess you can not read then. The original post made statements of gay marriage.
I can read just fine, Mr. (or Mrs.) Holland & Holland. Maybe the mention of gay marriage exists in your vivid imagination but it isn't in the original post. And before labeling someone as illiterate you would do well to invest in a spell check. It's spelled conservative, not "conservitive" as per your post. Maybe you need to educate yourself.
I never labeled you as illiterate. You did that quite on your own. As to my spelling, sorry though it must have been adequet as you managed to understand it. I would invest in spellcheck if it was available as an option on this site however I think we are just picking at nits and nats now are we not? If that is what makes you feel good is to try to win your arguement by picking on spelling on the internet then good luck with that as I do not see how that does anything for your arguement.
Is someone going to answer my question? Or are we all going to just pertend it did not happen?
Holland&Holland wrote:AFTERMATH wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Are you kidding me? No wonder we have lost and all our guns are going to be confiscated. We can't get gun people together over guns without agruing about abortion and gay marriage? Thanks guys, way to stick.
Liberty minded folks have the disadvantage of being architects attempting to build/rebuild a free society as they imagine it should be. Whereas the forces of tyranny have the advantage of being the demolition team. It doesn't really matter where they place their charges o swing the wrecking ball or demolish with a bulldozer. If they do it enough times, in enough places, it's going to bring the building down.
There lay the nearly impossible task before us, of gathering all of the architects together in relative cohesion. Coherence may be too much to ask for.
And who is the tyrant? That is the real question here. Seems like I have allot of people on "my side" who want to control me just as much as those on the other side.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests