Obama using executive fiat again

Firearms related political discussion forum

Obama using executive fiat again

Postby Snakeman721 on Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:02 am

Say goodbye to those imported Springfield M1's coming back from Korea and elsewhere. Obama just decided to use his executive privilege to ban imporatation of ALL used mil-surp rifles as "some may end up on the streets". Yeah right! When was the last time some thug was arrested with a mil-surp M1 as his weapon? um...NEVER! :angryvillagers:

http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/new ... n-Control/
Get off my lawn!
Snakeman721
 
Posts: 1354 [View]
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby jshuberg on Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:43 am

Remind me again where in the constitution the power of the Presidential executive order is defined?

This is legislation without representation, pure and simple. Where's my pitchfork...
NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor
NRA Certified Personal Protection In The Home Instructor
NRA Life Member
MCPPA Certified Instructor
Gulf War Veteran
User avatar
jshuberg
 
Posts: 1983 [View]
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:35 pm

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby Thunder71 on Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:13 am

...because the hood is full of M1 Garands.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby photogpat on Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:15 am

Thunder71 wrote:...because the hood is full of M1 Garands.


More importantly, it's full of Mosin Nagants! :roll:
Nothing to see here. Continue swimming.
User avatar
photogpat
 
Posts: 3702 [View]
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:01 pm
Location: Securely barricaded

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby xd ED on Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:16 am

...and firearms held in trusts are involved in how many crimes?
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9216 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby yuppiejr on Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:12 am

If I read the order correctly it specifically calls out a prohibition of reimportation of firearms that were provided to other countries (Greek or Korean M1 Garand/Carbines, etc..). I did not see it calling out importation of foreign military surplus firearms or ammo (yet).
User avatar
yuppiejr
 
Posts: 2853 [View]
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:01 pm
Location: Blaine, MN

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby Lights on Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:19 am

I hope somehow it is challenged and they make it here someday. Tell me again why this bozo is still in office?
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified RSO
User avatar
Lights
 
Posts: 366 [View]
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: Hastings, MN

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby darkwolf45 on Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:02 pm

Lights wrote:I hope somehow it is challenged and they make it here someday. Tell me again why this bozo is still in office?


Because we allowed it.
darkwolf45
Banned
 
Posts: 257 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:07 pm

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby JJ on Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:28 pm

darkwolf45 wrote:
Lights wrote:I hope somehow it is challenged and they make it here someday. Tell me again why this bozo is still in office?


Because we allowed it.


Because Republicans actually thought R-money was the answer.
"a man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." Frederick Douglass
User avatar
JJ
 
Posts: 3541 [View]
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Princeton

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby LePetomane on Thu Aug 29, 2013 1:32 pm

JJ wrote:Because Republicans actually thought R-money was the answer.


Why are you critical of Romney's wealth? You would be fine if it were yours.
Donald Trump got more fat women moving in one day than Michelle Obama did in eight years.
LePetomane
 
Posts: 2521 [View]
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:57 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere.

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby JJ on Thu Aug 29, 2013 1:56 pm

LePetomane wrote:
JJ wrote:Because Republicans actually thought R-money was the answer.


Why are you critical of Romney's wealth? You would be fine if it were yours.


I have no issue with his wealth, congrats to him.

Image
Image
He was a just a poor candidate, and represented the Wall Street RINO's, and America didn't want another RINO
"a man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." Frederick Douglass
User avatar
JJ
 
Posts: 3541 [View]
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Princeton

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby 2in2out on Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:52 pm

I don't understand why he would want to ban the import of M-1's that were made here and should return. It's like banning the import of 747's.
"...the liberties of the American people were dependent upon the ballot-box, the jury-box, and the cartridge-box; that without these no class of people could live and flourish in this country..." ---Frederick Douglass
User avatar
2in2out
 
Posts: 1014 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:19 am
Location: SE MN

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby LarryP on Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:18 pm

Then you don't understand anti gun democrats. YOU should not be allowed to own any firearms in their eyes
ANY gun banned is a victory for them.

2in2out wrote:I don't understand why he would want to ban the import of M-1's that were made here and should return. It's like banning the import of 747's.
LarryP
 
Posts: 1181 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:57 pm

Re: Obama using executive fiat again

Postby Texastransplant on Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:48 pm

I'm still trying to figure out how he can use executive authority to alter the NFA tax stamp process. Wouldn't that take an act of Congress? And if BATFE were to start requiring the proposed guidelines, wouldn't they in effect be breaking the law? I smell many law suits a'comin'.
Texastransplant
 
Posts: 238 [View]
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:05 am

Obama using executive fiat again

Postby jshuberg on Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:58 am

You forget that we live in a post-constitutional United States. Legislation is very rarely enacted through the legislative process, rather it's enacted via regulation, and the occasional executive order. This completely bypasses the role of congress, and is blatantly unconstitutional.

Because the people neither elect regulatory bureaucrats or the President (the electoral college does, the national Presidential election is nothing more than a popularity poll), most of the laws that we have to comply with were passed without elected representation.

Our forefathers went to war with the most powerful country in the world over taxation without representation. Yet modern Americans sit back and don't utter so much as a peep when we are forced to suffer legislation without representation. We have allowed every individual protection and every governmental restriction in the constitution to be infringed.

Every single one of us should be ashamed at what we've allowed our country to become.

End of rant......
NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor
NRA Certified Personal Protection In The Home Instructor
NRA Life Member
MCPPA Certified Instructor
Gulf War Veteran
User avatar
jshuberg
 
Posts: 1983 [View]
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:35 pm

Next

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron